View Poll Results: How many K's do you get out of tank of fuel?

Voters
1333. You may not vote on this poll
  • 300 - 350

    62 4.65%
  • 351 - 400

    96 7.20%
  • 401 - 450

    191 14.33%
  • 451 - 500

    222 16.65%
  • 501 - 550

    254 19.05%
  • 551 - 600

    217 16.28%
  • 600 +

    291 21.83%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 1199

Thread: Fuel Economy - What do you get out of a tank? (3rd gens only)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    matty.c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    580

    Default

    someone read that and tell me if it makes sense
    Now collecting old dead car batteries! PM me!

  2. #2
    BLAK LABL :) Spackbace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    2,282

    Default

    i wish petrol was $1.27/L....!

    ok, lets compare... and be realistic
    reg unleaded - around $1.40/L
    98 RON - $1.49/L
    Weekly petrol usage - 60L

    Fill up each week:
    reg - $84
    98 RON - $89.40

    thats $5.40 p/w extra, or $280.80 p/year

    considering 3rd gens dont actually have a knock sensor, hence seeing no improvement with higher RON petrol, besides it cleaning the engine, tell me how spending $280.80 extra per year is meant to be so worthwhile...?

    and this all isnt referring to the recent fuel spike, where petrol could be up to $1.49/L for unleaded, and $1.58 for 98 RON

    some people are living on a budget... dont knock them for doing so, its why 4c fuel vouchers are so prevalent
    2003 KJ Verada EI, sable black, lowered, 18s

  3. #3
    matty.c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    580

    Default

    cos i get on average 60km more to the tank thats costing me an extra $4.50 to fill.. 60km would use in my car about 5.08 L of petrol..

    so 60L of regular gets 520km
    and 60L of 98 get me usually over 580km (same mix of city/highway)

    so in fact it's saving me money.. cos 5L of petrol (cos using normal 91 would need an extra 5L of it @ your 1.40) = $7 and it's only an extra $5.40 to fill it initially with 98 octane.. which would give you the extra 60km milage...

    to thats a $1.60 saving per tank
    Now collecting old dead car batteries! PM me!

  4. #4
    matty.c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    580

    Default

    .. fill up on tuesdays..

    i usually go through about 40L per week.. and yes 11.8L is pretty bad.. i have 20's and it's already in the heavier KJ verada.. i don't think it's the best combination for economy!

    but thanks for the input!
    Now collecting old dead car batteries! PM me!

  5. #5
    matty.c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    580

    Default

    yeh sorry my point for using the 98.. is that i had noticed the car idle smoother after some good injector cleaner, t/b clean.. and now that i constantly use 98 octane the car rarley vibrates on idle..
    Now collecting old dead car batteries! PM me!

  6. #6
    Blown 3.6L wookiee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Australia's Capital Territory
    Posts
    1,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spackbace
    i wish petrol was $1.27/L....!

    ok, lets compare... and be realistic
    reg unleaded - around $1.40/L
    98 RON - $1.49/L
    Weekly petrol usage - 60L

    Fill up each week:
    reg - $84
    98 RON - $89.40

    thats $5.40 p/w extra, or $280.80 p/year

    considering 3rd gens dont actually have a knock sensor, hence seeing no improvement with higher RON petrol, besides it cleaning the engine, tell me how spending $280.80 extra per year is meant to be so worthwhile...?

    and this all isnt referring to the recent fuel spike, where petrol could be up to $1.49/L for unleaded, and $1.58 for 98 RON

    some people are living on a budget... dont knock them for doing so, its why 4c fuel vouchers are so prevalent
    when you take the percentages into account, if the 98 stays 9-10c/L more expensive than 91, then it makes more sense to use it when the price is high!!

    and if you get better than ~8% increase in mileage (i.e. more than about 50kms out of a tank) then you are better off using 98.

    .wook
    my beast - 1:10.686 @ Wakefield - 49.75 @ Fairbairn - 182.5kW @ 7psi
    "When you come home smelling like transmission fluid, it's bad, but it's not like hookers and crack!" - Jay Leno

  7. #7
    BLAK LABL :) Spackbace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    2,282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wookiee
    when you take the percentages into account, if the 98 stays 9-10c/L more expensive than 91, then it makes more sense to use it when the price is high!!
    yes percentage wise it does, but when its already a ~$80 blow to the wallet, why would you wanna pay anything more

    Quote Originally Posted by wookiee
    and if you get better than ~8% increase in mileage (i.e. more than about 50kms out of a tank) then you are better off using 98.
    and this is still in 2 stages at the moment, not everyone has found economy differences anywhere near that.


    oh, and we're not including fuel vouchers here (thus a further saving of approx $2.40 p/w), as well as hunting for the cheapest price (sometimes caltex is far cheaper than bp), and this all blows the difference out above $10

    *uses fuelwatch*

    cheapest reg within decent distance - 136.6 (caltex woolies, so with fuel voucher = 132.6
    cheapest 98 RON within decent distance - 146.6 (caltex woolies, so 142.6)
    or if u want, cheapest BP 98 RON is 150.5

    so minimum 10c/L difference, up to a minimum of 17.9c/L for BP branded fuel

    so please, dont push 'economy' figures etc at me when theres huge price differences right now
    2003 KJ Verada EI, sable black, lowered, 18s

  8. #8
    matty.c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    580

    Default

    i understand that.. but really you only need to be getting an extra 30km to a tank to be breaking even when using the 98 octane.. when u look at the $$$ to mileage..

    i understand that for some ppl every $ counts.. like young families and mortages etc etc belive me i know about that! for me it's saving money cos of the less need to go back to the bowser.. and i know it's better for my engine so i do it anyway..

    were a little off topic..
    Now collecting old dead car batteries! PM me!

  9. #9
    Blown 3.6L wookiee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Australia's Capital Territory
    Posts
    1,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spackbace
    yes percentage wise it does, but when its already a ~$80 blow to the wallet, why would you wanna pay anything more
    so you can drive a little further between fill ups?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spackbace
    and this is still in 2 stages at the moment, not everyone has found economy differences anywhere near that.
    I'm going from matty.c's numbers. I don't have any other number to go by.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spackbace
    oh, and we're not including fuel vouchers here (thus a further saving of approx $2.40 p/w), as well as hunting for the cheapest price (sometimes caltex is far cheaper than bp), and this all blows the difference out above $10

    *uses fuelwatch*

    cheapest reg within decent distance - 136.6 (caltex woolies, so with fuel voucher = 132.6
    cheapest 98 RON within decent distance - 146.6 (caltex woolies, so 142.6)
    or if u want, cheapest BP 98 RON is 150.5

    so minimum 10c/L difference, up to a minimum of 17.9c/L for BP branded fuel

    so please, dont push 'economy' figures etc at me when theres huge price differences right now
    you're not making much sense. pay 8% more to go 18% further (not my numbers). that makes perfect sense to me.

    there's not HUGE price differences... your numbers say 10c\L (132.6 vs 142.6) from the same place, and that's only 7.5% more. you can't compare BP 98 to *discounted* Caltex 91 and say that's the price difference when there's discounted 98 at Caltex for 7.9c\L less

    .wook
    Last edited by wookiee; 09-01-2008 at 01:19 PM.

  10. #10
    matty.c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spackbace
    i wish petrol was $1.27/L....!

    ok, lets compare... and be realistic
    reg unleaded - around $1.40/L
    98 RON - $1.49/L
    Weekly petrol usage - 60L

    Fill up each week:
    reg - $84
    98 RON - $89.40

    thats $5.40 p/w extra, or $280.80 p/year

    considering 3rd gens dont actually have a knock sensor, hence seeing no improvement with higher RON petrol, besides it cleaning the engine, tell me how spending $280.80 extra per year is meant to be so worthwhile...?

    and this all isnt referring to the recent fuel spike, where petrol could be up to $1.49/L for unleaded, and $1.58 for 98 RON

    some people are living on a budget... dont knock them for doing so, its why 4c fuel vouchers are so prevalent
    because but not using it your effectivly spending an extra $364.00 to travel the same km's as you would when using 98ron.. i know not everyone see a 60km gain the first time they fill up with 98.. but after a few tank's you definitly start to notice the economy getting better..
    Now collecting old dead car batteries! PM me!

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts